<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t read those bloggers&#8230; they&#8217;re unclean!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/</link>
	<description>The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Girlfriend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon another reading, he is not so critical of today&#039;s journalists - I retract that statement.  I don&#039;t disagree with your opinion of his article.  He obviously has a very skewed perception of bloggers.  I&#039;m sure there is the group out there that writes things with absolutely no basis in any factual information - strictly their opinion.  Where I do agree with him though is that the bloggers don&#039;t usually present their information without some level of personal bias - including snarky comments or leading statements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon another reading, he is not so critical of today&#8217;s journalists &#8211; I retract that statement.  I don&#8217;t disagree with your opinion of his article.  He obviously has a very skewed perception of bloggers.  I&#8217;m sure there is the group out there that writes things with absolutely no basis in any factual information &#8211; strictly their opinion.  Where I do agree with him though is that the bloggers don&#8217;t usually present their information without some level of personal bias &#8211; including snarky comments or leading statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skullsinthestars</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skullsinthestars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Girlfriend wrote: &quot;I read Skube’s article and while he is discounting bloggers ability to have the time and patience and access to get all the “facts” of a story he is still nailing today’s traditional journalists for their failure to do exactly that.&quot;

I guess I got set off by the fact that the article sounds (1) very elitist, (2) ignorant of the nature of the blogosphere and (3) completely non-constructive.  There&#039;s no real advice I can see for the blogosphere or for regular journalists; my feeling is that the article says, &quot;Sure, we&#039;re not doing a great job as journalists, but those bloggers should stay in their place.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Girlfriend wrote: &#8220;I read Skube’s article and while he is discounting bloggers ability to have the time and patience and access to get all the “facts” of a story he is still nailing today’s traditional journalists for their failure to do exactly that.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess I got set off by the fact that the article sounds (1) very elitist, (2) ignorant of the nature of the blogosphere and (3) completely non-constructive.  There&#8217;s no real advice I can see for the blogosphere or for regular journalists; my feeling is that the article says, &#8220;Sure, we&#8217;re not doing a great job as journalists, but those bloggers should stay in their place.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Girlfriend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/20/dont-read-those-bloggers-theyre-unclean/#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read Skube&#039;s article and while he is discounting bloggers ability to have the time and patience and access to get all the &quot;facts&quot; of a story he is still nailing today&#039;s traditional journalists for their failure to do exactly that.  Obviously there is a need for the kind of information that bloggers present otherwise, no one would read them.  I doubt that they exist solely for the purpose of allowing people to rant and rave about their perceived injustices or the government&#039;s shortcomings.  I feel like I have a much clearer understanding of the story after having read about it at one of the blogs I frequent.  Regardless though, journalists and their editors need to take heed - we are tired of having our news delivered to us in sound bites and the big stories glossed over.  If I never heard another thing about Britney, Lindsey or Paris, I would be thrilled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Skube&#8217;s article and while he is discounting bloggers ability to have the time and patience and access to get all the &#8220;facts&#8221; of a story he is still nailing today&#8217;s traditional journalists for their failure to do exactly that.  Obviously there is a need for the kind of information that bloggers present otherwise, no one would read them.  I doubt that they exist solely for the purpose of allowing people to rant and rave about their perceived injustices or the government&#8217;s shortcomings.  I feel like I have a much clearer understanding of the story after having read about it at one of the blogs I frequent.  Regardless though, journalists and their editors need to take heed &#8211; we are tired of having our news delivered to us in sound bites and the big stories glossed over.  If I never heard another thing about Britney, Lindsey or Paris, I would be thrilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

