Comments on: The gallery of failed atomic models, 1903-1913 http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/ The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Some Quick Links to Interesting Reads « Frontier Scientist http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-13414 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:57:56 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-13414 [...] http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/ Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

]]> By: Kenneth Snelson http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-13048 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:44:15 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-13048 Another “failed” model is described in my 1966 U.S patent (3276148) “Model for Atomic Forms”
http://snelsonatom.com/
Also Leonardo’s Atom! on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RNfFg4-xNY

]]> By: skullsinthestars http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-9111 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:59:34 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-9111 Very nice! Thanks for the link!

]]> By: Charles Baily http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-9108 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:51:22 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-9108 For anyone who might be interested, I wrote a paper for the 24th Regional Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science (2008) on essentially the same topic – I read many of the original papers discussed above as part of my research, and discuss them in some detail here:

http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/baily/papers/Atomic_Modeling.pdf

]]> By: Jimbob anonamous http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-8633 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:07:01 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-8633 This was a big help thanx

]]> By: skullsinthestars http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-4994 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:26:19 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-4994 Blake: Interesting! I’ll have to take a look at Ishiwara’s work…

]]> By: Blake Stacey http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-4993 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:49:55 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-4993 I just found out about another mostly-forgotten figure from the early days of quantum physics: Jun Ishiwara.

]]> By: skullsinthestars http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-4719 Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:33:06 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-4719 I guess the natural question is: What do you find unsatisfying or unexplained in the past 100 years of atomic and nuclear physics to justify a search for an alternative model?

]]> By: Franklin Hu http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-4717 Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:54:13 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-4717 There are continuing attempts to redefine the atomic model by cranks and crackpot hobby scientists like myself. It is interesting that none of the models mentioned ever attempted to come up with a solid structured approach to an atomic model. See:

http://franklinhu.com/buildatm.htm

This model does account for the ionization and spectral data. This is part of my broader theories

http://franklinhu.com/theory.html

]]> By: Science geek http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/#comment-4395 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:46:22 +0000 http://skullsinthestars.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-4395 this is an easy way to find how atoms are different and how they can be defined different ways. I really liked the magnet one I never thought it would be that way.

]]>