<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Faraday, grand unified theorist? (1851)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/</link>
	<description>The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ghost of June Past &#171; The Outer Hoard</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Ghost of June Past &#171; The Outer Hoard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-6646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Ghost of June&#160;Past 3 Jun 2010 &#8212; Flesh-eating Dragon   Early June is voting time for the Three Quarks Daily Prize in Science, and in a few days I hope to tell you which nominations are my personal favourites this time around. My favourites from last year&#8217;s competition included articles on mathematics in science, triboluminescence,  C. P. Snow of Two Cultures fame, and Faraday&#8217;s experiments with gravity. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ghost of June&nbsp;Past 3 Jun 2010 &#8212; Flesh-eating Dragon   Early June is voting time for the Three Quarks Daily Prize in Science, and in a few days I hope to tell you which nominations are my personal favourites this time around. My favourites from last year&#8217;s competition included articles on mathematics in science, triboluminescence,  C. P. Snow of Two Cultures fame, and Faraday&#8217;s experiments with gravity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-5118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the great discussion. I also found a paper on this topic: http://anadler.com/files/faraday.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great discussion. I also found a paper on this topic: <a href="http://anadler.com/files/faraday.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://anadler.com/files/faraday.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Stuff: Early June 2009 &#171; The Outer Hoard</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-3759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interesting Stuff: Early June 2009 &#171; The Outer Hoard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-3759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Faraday speculated on the unification of electricity and gravity. [via 3QD] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faraday speculated on the unification of electricity and gravity. [via 3QD] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skullsinthestars</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skullsinthestars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-3262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wade: Interesting!  That is a very nice example, and one I&#039;ll have to look into in the future.  

One of the nice things about reading historical papers is that it allows non-technical folks (like myself) an opportunity to see how experimental physics should be done, without all of the complicated modern technology obscuring the issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wade: Interesting!  That is a very nice example, and one I&#8217;ll have to look into in the future.  </p>
<p>One of the nice things about reading historical papers is that it allows non-technical folks (like myself) an opportunity to see how experimental physics should be done, without all of the complicated modern technology obscuring the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The difference between science and pseudoscience : Stochastic Scribbles</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The difference between science and pseudoscience : Stochastic Scribbles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-3250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post at Skulls in the Stars about how Michael Faraday attempted to experimentally find out if electricity and gravity were [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post at Skulls in the Stars about how Michael Faraday attempted to experimentally find out if electricity and gravity were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Walker</title>
		<link>http://skullsinthestars.com/2009/03/06/michael-faraday-grand-unified-theorist-1851/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wade Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skullsinthestars.com/?p=1634#comment-3246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faraday&#039;s gravity experiments remind me a bit of the experiments that British physicist Oliver Lodge did in the 1890s trying to show that the luminiferous ether had viscosity.

He set up a pair of heavy steel disks (a yard in diameter) on the same axle with a small gap between them, spun them at high speed, and sent a light beam through the gap. He hoped that the ether would be dragged along by the rapidly spinning disks, and cause a detectable interference with a light beam that hadn&#039;t gone between the disks.

At first he saw plenty of interference, and thought he had solid evidence of ether drag. But spinning the disks the opposite direction gave the same result (which it shouldn&#039;t have if there really was ether), and he eventually showed that it was the moving air, heat, and vibration of the apparatus affecting his interferometer.

Lodge and Faraday both kept pushing past the easy (but false) vindication, and got results that were true, regardless of their personal disappointment in the outcome. In my mind that&#039;s the mark of a real scientist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faraday&#8217;s gravity experiments remind me a bit of the experiments that British physicist Oliver Lodge did in the 1890s trying to show that the luminiferous ether had viscosity.</p>
<p>He set up a pair of heavy steel disks (a yard in diameter) on the same axle with a small gap between them, spun them at high speed, and sent a light beam through the gap. He hoped that the ether would be dragged along by the rapidly spinning disks, and cause a detectable interference with a light beam that hadn&#8217;t gone between the disks.</p>
<p>At first he saw plenty of interference, and thought he had solid evidence of ether drag. But spinning the disks the opposite direction gave the same result (which it shouldn&#8217;t have if there really was ether), and he eventually showed that it was the moving air, heat, and vibration of the apparatus affecting his interferometer.</p>
<p>Lodge and Faraday both kept pushing past the easy (but false) vindication, and got results that were true, regardless of their personal disappointment in the outcome. In my mind that&#8217;s the mark of a real scientist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

