Surprising fact about… Louisa May Alcott!

One of the fun things about studying pulp horror stories is learning unexpected trivia about the authors.  Just as often, though, the trivia learned is that a famous author ever indulged in such “sensationalist” writings!

As a case in point, I point the reader to the story, Lost in a Pyramid; or, The Mummy’s Curse, written by none other than Louisa May Alcott (1832-1888), probably best known for her novel Little Women:

“And what are these, Paul?” asked Evelyn, opening a tarnished gold box and examining its contents curiously.

“Seeds of some unknown Egyptian plant,” replied Forsyth, with a sudden shadow on his dark face, as he looked down at the three scarlet grains lying in the white hand lifted to him.

“Where did you get them?” asked the girl.

“That is a weird story, which will only haunt you if I tell it,” said Forsyth, with an absent expression that strongly excited the girl’s curiosity.

“Please tell it, I like weird tales, and they never trouble me. Ah, do tell it; your stories are always so interesting,” she cried, looking up with such a pretty blending of entreaty and command in her charming face, that refusal was impossible.

“You’ll be sorry for it, and so shall I, perhaps; I warn you beforehand, that harm is foretold to the possessor of those mysterious seeds,” said Forsyth, smiling, even while he knit his black brows, and regarded the blooming creature before him with a fond yet foreboding glance.

Forsyth describes how, on an expedition to Egypt, he and his colleague were lost within a maze of corridors within the great pyramid.  To escape, they are forced to defile the funerary trappings of one of its mummified inhabitants.  Their actions set in motion an ancient curse, which is fulfulled after Forsyth narrates his dark tale.

The story is charming, albeit possessing an ending which I found a little disappointing.  According to the Louisa May Alcott Encyclopedia, the story was written in late 1868 or the first week of 1869, around the same time that Little Women was written, and published in the Jan 16th issue of Frank Leslie’s The New World, for which Alcott received $25.  The Encyclopedia further notes that a hint of the inspiration for the story can be found in chapter 27 of Little Women itself:

She was just recovering from one of these attacks when she was prevailed upon to escort Miss Crocker to a lecture, and in return for her virtue was rewarded with a new idea. It was a People’s Course, the lecture on the Pyramids, and Jo rather wondered at the choice of such a subject for such an audience, but took it for granted that some great social evil would be remedied or some great want supplied by unfolding the glories of the Pharaohs to an audience whose thoughts were busy with the price of coal and flour, and whose lives were spent in trying to solve harder riddles than that of the Sphinx.

The character of Josephine “Jo” March is based on Alcott herself, and this passage hints at the inspiration Alcott herself used for the story.

Alcott is not the only author to have written “sensational” tales of horror.  I’ll come back to others in upcoming posts.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Horror. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Surprising fact about… Louisa May Alcott!

  1. Markk says:

    It is interesting how so much of todays canon of horror, supernatural, heck, adventure stories all seem to be based on early to mid-1800, say post Napolean to post Civil War writing. From Frankenstein on, it seems like there was a culture change. Mass printing kept this stuff around for us to read an influenced a lot more people? People starting to see the depth of history – ancient Egypt and such kind of came bac to Europe with Napoleon. Mass culture was starting to mature perhaps.

  2. Aydin says:

    I just read the mummy’s curse story. I thought the ending was fine. A poisonous plant slowly killing those who cultivate it-that was a fine revenge the sorceress took.

    • Aydin: I didn’t have a problem with the nature of the ending as much as the execution of it. The earlier scene in the tomb was quite creepy and atmospheric, but I felt like the ending was an example of “telling, not showing” what was going on. Overall, I found it a good story, just a little disappointing in the execution of the ending.

      You should really put *spoiler* if you’re going to discuss the ending! 🙂

  3. The Ridger says:

    Alcott loved the sensational stuff, but couldn’t support her family on it. Too bad…

  4. Ridger: Sort of funny, isn’t it? It apparently used to be the case that sensational fiction was not economically viable. Nowadays, it seems that the sensational stuff is more lucrative than more conventional fiction…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s