Antimatter goes down!

Hey folks, as you might have seen from my previous post, things have been a little hectic lately, and I haven’t had an opportunity to write some in-depth blog posts. While I wait for life to settle a bit again, I thought I’d share a bit of fascinating science news that you might have missed: researchers at CERN have figured out which way antimatter goes in a gravitational field!

To quote from the NSF’s press release today:

If you dropped some antimatter, would it fall down or up? Scientists now know the definitive answer: down. That is, if you can somehow prevent it from exploding into pure energy long enough to see where it goes.

A scientific paper describing the landmark experiment behind that conclusion is published today in the journal Nature and comes from the international Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus (ALPHA) collaboration at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland. The ALPHA collaboration’s unique, painstaking experiment has answered the longstanding fundamental question about whether antimatter is gravitationally attracted or repelled by regular matter by observing the downward path taken by individual atoms of antihydrogen. Their work also provides a key piece in one of the most immense unsolved puzzles in science — why is there so little antimatter in the observable universe?

We’ve known about the existence of antimatter for quite some time. It was first predicted to exist in a Paul Dirac’s relativistic quantum wave equation, now known as the Dirac equation, in 1928. The Dirac equation naturally results in solutions which are particles with negative energy, which Oppenheimer then speculated could represent antiparticles, such as a positively-charged antielectron and a negatively-charged proton. The first antimatter particle, the positron, was definitively detected in 1932 by Carl David Anderson, for which he won the Nobel Prize.

With such a long history, you might expect that we’ve nailed down quite well all the properties of antimatter, and you would be (mostly) correct. Antimatter is produced in the laboratory, or more accurately a particle accelerator, through collisions of high-energy particles. If enough energy is present to account for the mass of a particle/antiparticle pair, there is a chance that they will be created. But if particles and antiparticles are only created in pairs, where is all the antimatter in the universe, which appears to be made primarily of ordinary matter? This is one puzzle that we still do not have a definitive answer for.

Related to this is the question studied by the ALPHA-g experiment: does antimatter get attracted to ordinary matter via the force of gravity, or does it have the “anti-” effect and get repelled? Most theoretical considerations suggest that antimatter must be gravitationally attracted like ordinary matter, but a direct measurement had not yet been achieved to show this conclusively.

A big difficulty with doing such an experiment is getting enough slow-moving antimatter in one place! As I said, antimatter is produced through high-energy collisions, and the antimatter ends up moving really fast, which makes it hard to see how gravity affects it. Antimatter also annihilates with ordinary matter, so it usually doesn’t stick around long enough for experimental uses. Also, antimatter like positrons or antiprotons have electric charge, so they will experience a very strong electrical force, which will tend to overwhelm any gravitational effects.

In the ALPHA experiment, antiprotons are collected from CERN’s particle accelerator, and are brought together with positrons created from a radioactive isotope. In this way, electrically-neutral antihydrogen atoms can be created, and then they are routed into a vertical tube where they are trapped by magnetic fields. Then, the magnetic fields at the top and bottom of the tube are reduced, allowing the antiatoms to fall whichever way gravity takes them! In this case, they found that antimatter does indeed fall downward, attracted to the gravitational pull of the Earth.

This rules out one explanation of why there is so little antimatter in the universe. If antimatter were repelled from ordinary matter, it might have been pushed away in the early moments of the universe. But now that we know it isn’t, that explanation has been largely ruled out, allowing researchers to focus on other possibilities.

Research is ongoing at ALPHA to see if they can find any other differences between matter and antimatter — it is an experiment worth watching!

Posted in Science news | 1 Comment

Fundraising for Zoe’s leg surgery

This morning, my senior kitty Zoe somehow managed to break one of her front legs. She’s incredibly spry for her 17 years of age, and still jumps up and down from the bed and couch all the time, and presumably she landed wrong this time — I didn’t witness her injure herself, and we only found her holding up her front paw and opted to rush her to the emergency vet.

She’s staying the weekend there and will have surgery on Monday or Tuesday, and the surgery is estimated to be about $5000 due to the nature of the break. I have savings that I’ve set aside specifically for this sort of situation, but it is a big chunk of those savings, so I put together a GoFundMe to try to ameliorate the cost.

Zoe has brought me a lot of joy as a companion the past seventeen years, and if I’ve managed to bring any joy to any readers out there, I hope you’ll consider donating. I’m not ready to let Zoe go quite yet, if I can prevent it. She it a loving and lively kitty.

Here’s the GoFundMe link again. All these photos are from the last few weeks.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

Night of the Mannequins, by Stephen Graham Jones

I’ve been working on getting myself back into a regular reading habit, and to warm up I’ve been looking for some punchy short horror novels. When I was recently at my local Barnes & Noble, this book practically jumped off of the shelf at me:

I mean, there’s hardly anything creepier than the concept of mannequins coming to life! I picked up the book and read it pretty much in a day. It is a fun, punchy novel that isn’t quite what it’s title suggests it to be.

The book is narrated by a teenager named Sawyer, explaining the events that have led up to almost all of his friends being dead. It all starts with a mannequin that they found discarded in the wilderness one summer when they were kids. They named him “Manny,” and used him as a plaything that they shared between them until they finally reached high school and grew bored with him. He ended up in Sawyer’s garage, straddling his father’s unused motorcycle.

With high school ending soon, however, Sawyer and his circle decide to play one last prank with Manny on their friend Shanna, who works at the local movie theater. They dress up Manny in some clothes and sneak him into a movie with them, expecting that he’ll give a scare to Shanna and her coworkers when they stumble across him in the darkened theater. But when ushers come in to check everyone’s tickets, they pass right by Manny like he’s a regular customer.

And then, when the movie ends, Sawyer sees Manny get up and leave the theater with the rest of the audience.

Continue reading
Posted in Horror | Leave a comment

“Deterministic vortices evolving from partially coherent fields” in Optica!

Some exciting personal and optics news: I just had a paper published in the prestigious journal Optica with my student Wenrui Miao and my colleague Yongtao Zhang on “Deterministic vortices evolving from partially coherent fields.” The paper is open access, so you can read it for free from anywhere, if you are so interested.

Optica has a rather high standard for publication — your work has to be considered broadly significant to optics and, obviously, well presented and correct. So this is a big deal for me, and I thought I would share a short non-technical description of what the paper is about!

So, this paper is about mixing two subfields of optics: coherence theory and singular optics, which are two of my theoretical specialties. Let’s start with a little discussion of singular optics. Light is a wave, and if you try to visualize a wave, you will most likely imagine something like shown below.

We have a snapshot in time here of a wave like a wave on a string, with repeated wiggles up and down as it travels to the right. If it oscillates at a single frequency, it is known as a monochromatic (“single color”) wave, and in much of optics we study waves that are at least approximately monochromatic. This works for lasers, but not with normal light sources like light bulbs or the sun — more on this momentarily.

Continue reading
Posted in Optics, Personal | Leave a comment

An Ode to Empire of the Petal Throne

In addition to my long Twitter threads about Old School Dungeons & Dragons products, I’ve written a couple of “odes” to particularly good and influential products, namely Tomb of Horrors and Temple of Elemental Evil.

Now I want to do a shoutout to one of the oldest of RPG products, and one of the hardest to find in the wild! I am talking about the (almost) original edition of Empire of the Petal Throne, published by TSR in 1975. I have previously said, jokingly (I hope), that I would kill someone to get a vintage copy of this game; this summer, when I got a nice performance bonus, I decided to just go ahead and get one for myself, which was not cheap but not as expensive as you might think!

I’ve previously done an Old School thread on Petal Throne, but wanted to revisit it now that I have my own copy. This post will be a mix of my original thread plus photos of my acquisition. Let’s begin with the box:

Just take this cover image in for a moment. This is one of the most gorgeous and creative covers I’ve ever seen for an RPG product — a stylized map of the lands of the Empire. This alone made me want to own a copy of this game, because this image isn’t included in any reprints of the game.

Continue reading
Posted in role-playing games | 2 Comments

Camp Damascus, by Chuck Tingle

One thing I’ve long believed is that truly powerful stories, the ones that stay with you, are the ones that are truly about something meaningful to the author. As a general rule, no great stories are purely “entertainment,” even though they might appear to be so at first. A great example of this is the collection of Conan stories by Robert E. Howard, which really set the standard for pulp fantasy adventure. I recall reading an intro to a Conan collection once that referred to the stories as “pure entertainment,” but that isn’t true: Howard’s noble barbarian stories were a reaction to the organized crime and corruption he saw living in oil boom Texas in the 1920s. Howard developed a very negative opinion of “civilization” in general, which he saw as bringing more harm on a massive scale than it did benefits, and it is impossible to miss this view reading the stories once you’re made aware of it. I personally think that Howard’s views, whether you ascribe to them or not, contribute greatly to their power.

I was thinking of this while reading the excellent and moving Camp Damascus by Chuck Tingle, published earlier this year.

Camp Damascus is Tingle’s debut horror novel, and it is a fun, compelling, and moving story about a Christian gay conversion camp that is far more — and worse — than it seems.

Continue reading
Posted in Horror | 1 Comment

16 years of Skulls in the Stars!

Just a quick note that I’ve been blogging now for 16 years, as of today, as WordPress reminded me!

It’s wild that 16 years is almost 1/3 of my life that I’ve been writing this blog, and no plans to stop! This week, I’m prepping for my talk at the Natural Sciences Museum and then at Malaprop’s Cafe, so please check those events out if you want some content for me in the meantime.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

Invisibility talk at Natural Sciences at Raleigh!

Wanted to announce that I’ll be doing a Science Cafe at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences this coming Thursday, August 17th, at 7:00 pm!

It will be both an in-person event as well as a livestream on YouTube, so I hope to “see” folks there one way or another! I’m putting together a new presentation on the history of invisibility, and hope to bring along some weird science demos to show off, so it should be fun!

Posted in Invisibility, Personal | Leave a comment

A “remarkable lightning stroke,” 1879

One of the fun things about reading early science journals and magazines is finding anecdotes about unusual phenomena that are sent in by readers and published. While I was writing my previous blog post about Tyndall and Mayer, I came across a letter in The Popular Science Monthly from 1879, simply titled, “Remarkable lightning stroke.” The letter, written by Robert F. Jackson, Jr. from Macon, Georgia, on May 20, 1879, is a fascinating lightning event, and I reproduce the letter in full below.

There recently occurred in our city a case of stroke by lightning which, no doubt, from its strange freaks, will be of interest to the readers of The Popular Science Monthly. It took place in a grocery store, and two persons were the sufferers. The bolt, after tearing up the eaves of the house, entered it on the side, leaving a smutty stain between the cracks. It bulged out the side of the shop for several feet, put out the lamp, knocked down many articles from the shelves, took off the tops of several lamp-chimneys resting on them, completely tore off the paper wrappers of many small cakes of soap, and finally emerged at the corner of the room, tearing off several planks. In the passage of the current from one division of the shelves to the other, it either split the dividing boards or passed under them, partially fusing the nails and charring the adjacent wood. But what makes the stroke most remarkable is the way in which it affected the two men who were struck. One of them, Ware, was stunned for a few moments, had his pipe knocked from his mouth several feet away, and was left with a red, sore scar across his cheek and a paralysis of his arms, which latter remained for about two hours. Still more strangely did it deal with the other man, Bullard, who was resting upon the show-case opposite Ware. The current passed up his arm, under the armpit, down the right side of the body to the thigh, leaped across to the inner side of the left leg, and passed down the leg to the foot. It made a red bunch and sore mark upon the body, singed the hair from both legs, and left the sufferer unconscious for more than twenty-four hours. Both have fully recovered, with the exception of a little soreness. In both cases we noted the spiral direction of the current. The house was low, in a depressed situation, and protected with a rod.

Lightning was an unending source of fascination for early pre-1900s researchers, and it seems that any story of a strange lightning strike could be published in the scientific journals. I have previously shared a story of an 1880 observation of ball lightning, and an article asking the curious question, “Are beech trees ever struck by lightning?” from 1889. This was not just a problem of scientific interest, of course, as lightning can kill, and famously killed one person researching it.

Lightning rods have mitigated much of the danger to buildings from lightning strikes, but still about 28 people die each year in the U.S. due to lightning, so it is still not to be taken lightly.

Posted in ... the Hell?, History of science | Leave a comment

Me on science writing in Optics & Photonics News!

A couple of months ago, the folks who run Optics & Photonics News at Optica, the optical society, asked if I could write a post for their “careers” blog about my path to writing popular science books. Well, the post is now published! I’m not sure if there’s a subscription wall or not to read it, but I wanted to share the info here either way.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment