John Wyndham’s The Day of the Triffids (1951)

This continues my brief foray into 1950s/1960s horror/science fiction, which I started with John W. Campbell’s Who Goes There?, which was the source for The Thing From Another World and John Carpenter’s The Thing.  Today let’s talk triffids!  A couple of weeks ago I finished reading John Wyndham’s classic apocalyptic novel, The Day of the Triffids (1951), and I thought I’d share some observations about it and how it relates to the science fiction film of the same name.

To be honest, I was, until recently, completely ignorant of the fact that The Day of the Triffids had originally been a novel!  When I was a kid, I saw films such as Day of the Triffids (1962) on Sunday morning “creature features”, and it never occurred to me that many of the sci-fi/horror film classics were based on original novels.

To be even more honest, I was an easily frightened child, and Day of the Triffids was, to me, the scariest movie I could imagine: the idea of giant plants taking over the world frightened me terribly!  (Decide for yourself if I was justified: the whole movie can be seen starting here.)

The novel starts with eerie silence:

When a day that you happen to know is Wednesday starts off by sounding like Sunday, there is something seriously wrong somewhere.

Bill Mason, the novel’s protagonist, has been laid up in the hospital with bandages over his eyes.  On the day the bandages are to be removed, he awakens to a sinister stillness in the air.  The night before, a spectacular meteor shower had lit up the sky across the globe, and all who had witnessed the display wake up to permanent blindness.  Unaware of this, at first, Bill gropes his way into the corridor:

“Hey” I shouted.  “I want some breakfast.  Room forty-eight!”

For a moment nothing happened.  Then came voices all shouting together.  It sounded like hundreds of them, and not a word coming through clearly.  It was as though I’d put on a record of crowd noises — and an ill-disposed crowd, at that.  I had a nightmarish flash, wondering whether I had been transferred to a mental home while I was sleeping and that this was not St. Merryn’s Hospital at all.  The sound of those voices simply didn’t sound normal to me.  I closed the door hurriedly on the babel and groped my way back to bed.

Bill works up the courage to remove his bandages himself, and goes out to explore the sights of London, which is paralyzed by the blindness of its inhabitants.  He rather quickly meets another ‘sight survivor’, Josella, and the two of them find their way to what seems to be the last remnant of civilization in town.  Things do not go terribly well, though, and the survivors must contend with the darkness of humanity, as well as the rise of the triffids.

For someone who only recalls the movie version of the story, last seen quite some time ago, I was surprised to find that the existence of the triffids is completely independent of the meteor shower.  In the book, the triffids arrived on the scene long before.  In his personal record, Bill recounts his own childhood, and the year when people started finding these strange new plants growing in their yards.  The plants turn out to be dangerous, with whip-like, poison-laden stalks that can kill a man with a single blow.  Even worse, a triffid can, when fully grown, detach its roots from the ground and become mobile:

When it “walked” it moved rather like a man on crutches.  Two of the blunt “legs” slid forward, then the whole thing lurched as the rear one drew almost level with them, then the two in front slid forward again.  At each “step” the long stem whipped violently back and forth; it gave one a kind of seasick feeling to watch it.  As a method of progress it looked both strenuous and clumsy — faintly reminiscent of young elephants at play.  One felt that if it were to go on lurching for long in that fashion it would be bound to strip all its leaves if it did not actually break its stem.  Nevertheless, ungainly though it looked, it was contriving to cover the ground at something like an average walking pace.

The origin is not completely explained, but it is darkly hinted that biological experimentation gone awry, even bioweapons development, lay at the heart of the mystery.  Nevertheless, once it is found that triffids produced edible oil of a superior nature, they become another crop to be harvested — albeit a crop that must be chained in place and “defanged”.

For sightless humanity, the triffids become a serious threat, and it is unnerving at how quickly the creatures seem to break their bonds once the meteor shower hits.  Bill has an extra advantage against them, having worked as a triffid harvester in his pre-apocalyptic career.

It is interesting to note, though, that the novel is less about the triffids and more about how to rebuild/maintain society in the face of catastrophe.  Bill encounters a number of different groups struggling to rebuild during his travels, and each of them represents a different form of governing.  He finds groups which are feudal, democratic, socialist, and even theocratic.  Much of the story of the novel deals with the failure of a number of these groups, usually linked to their inability to accept the harsh reality of the new world order.

One of the biggest differences between the novel and the movie is the ending.  The movie has an extremely dramatic climax, with some definite resolution to the crisis, while the book is much more open-ended.  It could be said that the book’s ending is even somewhat anti-climactic, though it does tie in extremely well with the rest of the novel and, in my opinion, sums up nicely some of the points that Wyndham was trying to make with the novel.

It’s also worth mentioning that there was a 1981 television series adaptation made by the BBC.

There are a few other Wyndham novels I want to read through, and a few other sci-fi/horror classics, and we’ll get to them in future posts!

This entry was posted in Horror. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to John Wyndham’s The Day of the Triffids (1951)

  1. Markk says:

    For some reason I still find horror and SF from about the early thirties to about 1950 had a much more chilling sense of alienness and time in them. Who Goes There as an example you covered. Triffids also has that somehow out of focus weirdness about the plants. Other suns, weird landscapes, what centuries really mean – things were different. I wonder where that descriptive ability has gone?

    I can’t really think of any current author that has it. Part of it might be that the 30’s are getting far enough away that they really are different than today but close enough technically to have the difference really make things feel odd. But I felt this way reading Triffids in the early 1970’s too.

  2. Markk: I wonder if part of the difference is really the state of science in that earlier era compared with today. In the 30’s to the 50’s it probably seemed that everything and anything was truly possible, with the rapid progress being made. By the 60’s, though, I think it started to sink in that space travel is hard, most planets are uninhabitable, and the laws of physics set some really heavy constraints on what is possible.

    I might summarize this by saying that science-fiction went from an excited “What’s next?” to a wistful, “What if…”

  3. Markk says:

    Continuing way beyond the normal timeline of blogs …

    I wasn’t really thinking of space travel fiction or hard science fiction really. Thinking more about it, the writers back then had an ability to show that 1000’s of years are vast beyond human understanding – forget 10’s of thousands even. Thinking of things even where there are spaceships like Leigh Brackett’s Skaith novels. Things changed, civilizations came and went, and there was an eerieness to them. I do think that the knowledge explosion in the last 70 years has changed things. We are on the other side of a cultural gap.

    I still haven’t figured out what specifically about the writing gives that feeling, but it is there and I don’t find it today, even in very good more current works that deal with layers of time and culture like Iain Banks’ books.

  4. Markk wrote: “Continuing way beyond the normal timeline of blogs …”

    That’s fine – I don’t mind continuing sci-fi discussions! (I only get irritated when people decide to pick a fight on ancient political posts.)

    I don’t have a great answer myself to the change in tone. It does seem to be a cultural gap. Amending my earlier comment, it seems that in the 30’s to the 50’s notions of the age of the universe, and our place in it, were still quite new to people, and that newness created a certain tone that’s hard to recapture now that such ideas are commonplace (still awe-inspiring, of course, but commonplace).

    I experienced a feeling similar to that you felt reading Iain Banks’ books when I read Stirling’s In the Courts of the Crimson Kings. It is a modern-style Burroughs adventure, and quite good, but somehow doesn’t have the same feeling as Burroughs’ “Barsoom” series.

  5. Pingback: John Wyndham’s The Kraken Wakes | Skulls in the Stars

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.