Is it worse, or better, than a creationist on the school board?

Once again the folks at The Onion have demonstrated their satirical genius!  They ‘report’ on an Arkham, MA school board member who is pushing to add the unspeakable, sanity-shattering dark arts to the curriculum:

“Fools!” said West, his clenched fist striking the lectern before him. “We must prepare today’s youth for a world whose terrors are etched upon ancient clay tablets recounting the fever-dreams of the other gods—not fill their heads with such trivia as math and English. Our graduates need to know about those who lie beneath the earth, waiting until the stars align so they can return to their rightful place as our masters and wage war against the Elder Things and the shoggoths!”

The article is very entertaining, even for those with only a passing knowledge of the works of H.P. Lovecraft.  (h/t Pharyngula)

Posted in Lovecraft, Silliness | Leave a comment

Faraday brings light and magnetism together (1845)

The more I read of Michael Faraday’s work, the more I am in awe  of the scientist’s insights and abilities.  As evidence of the remarkable intuition he had regarding the forces of nature, consider the following passage:

I have long held an opinion, almost amounting to conviction, in common I believe with many others of natural knowledge, that the various forms under which the forces of matter are made manifest have one common origin; or, in other words, are so directly and mutually dependent, that they are convertible, as it were, one into another, and possess equivalents of power in their action.  In modern times the proofs of their convertibility have been accumulated to a very considerable extent, and a commencement made of the determination of their equivalent forces.

Faraday wrote this as the introduction to the nineteenth series of his “Experimental Researches in Electricity,” published in the Philosophical Transactions (vol 136, pp. 1-20) in 1846!  It is an eloquent and remarkably timeless statement which could very well have been written by any modern physicist working on the foundations of a grand unified theory of forces.

As he himself notes in the passage above, Faraday was not alone in envisioning a single theory encompassing all physical phenomena.  Indeed, once Ørsted discovered that a magnetic compass needle could be deflected by an electric current, the relationship of electricity and magnetism, as well as other forces, was very much on the minds of physicists.  Faraday, however, led the charge in actually demonstrating these relations.  As I have noted in previous blog posts, Faraday demonstrated experimentally that magnets could induce electric currents (Faraday induction) around 1831, and also compiled evidence demonstrating that the diverse sources of electricity were different manifestations of the same electrical phenomena around 1833.

Because of these discoveries (and other hugely important ones that I haven’t had time yet to discuss), by 1845 Faraday was one of the most prestigious and famous scientists in England.  He was by no means done with his research, however, and in that year he presented a paper describing his observations that a magnetic field can indirectly influence the behavior of a light wave.  This was the first definitive evidence that light and electromagnetism are related, and helped pave the way for Maxwell’s brilliant theoretical demonstration of the existence of electromagnetic waves, and their identity with light.

The effect that Faraday observed is now known as Faraday rotation, and we take a look at the experiments, and their reception, in this post.

Continue reading

Posted in History of science, Optics, Physics | 14 Comments

Michael Faraday, scientific rock-star!

I’ve been planning another post on the scientific discoveries of Michael Faraday, but in the process of researching his work on so-called Faraday rotation, I came across a wonderful story which is too charming not to share!

By 1844, Faraday was at the height of his popularity, and reports of his discoveries would apparently be devoured by scientists and non-scientists alike.  One would hesitate to compare his popularity to a modern rock star’s, but then there’s this charming anecdote from The Life and Letters of Faraday, vol 2 (1870).

Faraday received a letter from a lady ‘of the highest talent’ who proposed ‘to become his disciple and go through with him all his own experiments.’  The lady’s name is not mentioned by Dr. Bence Jones, who compiled the letters; it was likely still considered rather improper in that era for a lady to boldly apply for a research assistantship from one of the most prominent scientists of the day.  Faraday, however, gave a charming and very cordial response (Oct 24, 1844):

Continue reading

Posted in History of science | 4 Comments

Faking tilt-shift photography, via Photoshop

I recently took another look at my post on depth of focus and depth of field, and noticed to my chagrin that the link to the original ‘miniworld’ pics, which show how a real scene can be made to look miniature by appropriate blurring, had been broken!

Fortunately, it’s no great mystery how such images are done.  I easily found a very nice webpage that describes in detail how to manipulate your own photographs using Photoshop.  The results of my crude tinkering are shown below (click on the pictures to see the full effect):

florabama

jaapedenbaan

zuiderkerk02

The first one is of houses on the coast near the Florida-Alabama border, the second is of the ice rink Jaap Edenbaan in Amsterdam, and the third is a view of Amsterdam from the Zuiderkerk.  I put these pictures into an update on the depth of field post.

One thing is worth noting about this technique: real miniature photographs have a narrow depth of field, which means that only objects at a certain distance from the camera will be in focus.  The Photoshop technique shown here fakes this by creating a vertical gradient blur on the image.  To look reasonable, however, the image must be one for which the vertical axis of the picture maps more or less to the actual distance of the object from the camera.  Big objects in the foreground, which stretch across the vertical axis of the picture, can ruin the effect.  For instance, check out this attempt on a Providence cemetary:

cemetaryprovidence

The trees on the left and right (and the church steeple, to a lesser extent) disrupt the illusion, to my eye.

Posted in Optics | 2 Comments

Adventures in iRiff-ery!

I’ve been a fan of Mystery Science Theater 3000 for years.   If you’re not familiar, the show consisted of a human host and two wisecracking (puppet) robots ridiculing bad science fiction, fantasy, and horror films, and was generally a hoot! (I pay tribute to the show with my category, “…the Hell?“, which was a common refrain by Tom Servo.)

Like plenty of fans, I  found myself almost uncontrollably ridiculing films and television shows, much to the chagrin of my friends and fiancée!  After MST3K ended its run in 1999,  the comedians on the show apparently felt very much the same way: several of them started a company called RiffTrax, in which they record audio commentaries for movies (‘riffs’) which can be played in sync with the DVD audio track.  This brilliant premise means that the RiffTrax folks don’t need to fight for costly film rights and can riff on pretty much any film they like, including new and terrible releases such as The Happening!

Well, last fall they introduced a new innovation: iRiffs, in which the fans can write, record, and sell their own riffs through the RiffTrax store!  I was intrigued, and started writing a script almost immediately.  A recent deadline for an iRiff contest (which I didn’t really make) spurred me to finish my iRiff of the 1998 American version of Godzilla, which is now available online!  I thought I’d share some observations about the iRiff construction process in this post.

Continue reading

Posted in ... the Hell?, Entertainment | 7 Comments

Bobby Jindal hates lifesaving research!

This one’s been bugging me all day, and although others have tackled it admirably, I wanted to give my perspective, and an amateur would-be vulcanologist.  In the Republican response to President Obama’s speech last night, in which he strongly defended the stimulus bill, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal had the following to say:

While some of the projects in the [stimulus] bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8 billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a ‘magnetic levitation’ line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something called ‘volcano monitoring.’ Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.

There’s a lot wrong with this statement; for instance, as pointed out by Steven Benen, the quip about a rail line from Las Vegas to Disneyland is pure Republican fantasy.  What really angered me, though, is the mocking tone Jindal had for ‘volcano monitoring’.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Science news | 3 Comments

E is for Edward, who birthday was today…

Via The Greenbelt, I see that today was the birthday of macabre artist Edward Gorey (1925-2000), who produced such bizarre and twisted classics such as The Gashlycrumb Tinies and The Curious Sofa.  It is an interesting coincidence since I just referred to Gorey only a few days ago in relation to the upcoming horror game The Path.

To celebrate, The Greenbelt points us to a wonderful little short online quiz: What will be your Edward Gorey death, in which you can determine what sort of Gashlycrumb Tinies fate is most fitting for you!

I got Xerxes:

xerxes

“You will be devoured by mice. You are so shy and always off alone in the corner. No one knows you are there except for the blood thirsty rodents.”

Doesn’t really seem to fit my personality, but who am I to argue with an online quiz?

P.S.  My apologies to Blake if this reopens old wounds

Posted in Entertainment | 9 Comments

A. Merritt’s Dwellers in the Mirage

Abraham Merritt (1888-1943) was one of the greats of pulp fiction, although up until recently his work was largely forgotten.  Recently, two of his novels were reprinted, The Moon Pool (1919) and The Metal Monster (1920), both of which I’ve blogged about in some detail.  I found The Moon Pool, on the whole, a rather ordinary pulp adventure novel punctuated by scenes of brilliant weirdness, while The Metal Monster was a truly unique masterpiece of weird fiction.

I wanted to see where other works of Merritt would fall on the mundane/genius scale, but the book that most caught my eye isn’t currently in press.  Dwellers in the Mirage (1932) was too intriguing to pass up for me, though, as the cover will make clear:

dwellersinthemirage

That tentacled monster on the cover of the novel is the “terrible octopus-god Khalk’ru”, who heralds from an area outside space and time.  If you read H.P. Lovecraft, Merritt’s “Khalk’ru” will sound very much like Lovecraft’s “Cthulhu“.  Let’s take a closer look at Merritt’s interpretation of the Cthulhu mythos…

Continue reading

Posted in Adventure fiction, Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, Weird fiction | 7 Comments

A personal academic milestone!

Well, I’ve managed to graduate my first doctoral student!  I was confident in his ability to pass the dissertation defense, but I was still probably as nervous as he was.  Did I train him well enough?  Is his research sound enough?  All sorts of uncomfortable questions start to float through one’s mind before the talk.

He passed with flying colors, though!  Now my problem is figuring out how I’ll continue his line of research when he leaves…

Posted in Personal | 11 Comments

The Giant’s Shoulders #8 is up!

The eighth edition of The Giant’s Shoulders is up at Greg Laden’s Blog, with a special emphasis on birthday boy Charles Darwin!  Many thanks to Greg for putting it together!

The next edition will appear on March 16th at The Evilutionary Biologist.

Posted in General science, Science news | Leave a comment