ResearchBlogging editor’s selections: Volcanoes and evolution, fine-grained space, and Earth’s CO2 sensitivity

  • Nyamulagira Volcano and Human Evolution. Greg Laden of Greg Laden’s Blog describes some of his own published research speculating that humans may have split from chimps on the slopes of volcanoes!  It is a fascinating post with great personal anecdotes that illustrate how research is done in the field.
  • Space is very fine-grained. Theories that attempt to connect gravity to quantum mechanics rely on the idea that space is “rough” on a very, very small scale.  But how can one measure such roughness?  Charles Daney at Science and Reason describes experimental efforts involving supernovas and high-energy gamma rays.
  • Is the Earth even more sensitive to CO2 levels than we thought? A puzzling aspect of climate science related to warming is that CO2 levels were thought to have been much, much higher in prehistoric eras.  In a very thoughtful and well balanced post, James Hrynyshyn of The Island of Doubt discusses recent research that suggests that the CO2 levels may have been much lower than previously thought — and the Earth much more sensitive to CO2 levels.

Check back next Monday for more “miscellaneous” suggestions!

Posted in General science, Science news | Leave a comment

Mythbusters were scooped — by 130 years! (Finger in the barrel)

During my first evening in San Antonio, I sequestered myself in my hotel room to polish up my presentation.  Fortunately, there was a Mythbusters marathon on the Discovery Channel at that time, so I was able to keep myself marginally sane by watching the ‘Busters abuse places, things, and themselves for the cause of science.

One of the episodes that played during the marathon contained the “finger in the barrel” myth — the idea that a person can stick a finger in the barrel of a rifle or shotgun as it fires, causing the barrel to split like a banana peel without harm to the finger!  The initial investigation of the ‘busters clearly demonstrated that a finger would certainly be lost in the attempt, and that a barrel would not split in the manner suggested.  An updated investigation two years later, however, demonstrated that a rifle barrel could be split if sufficiently weakened by use.

In a remarkable case of serendipity, the next evening I was browsing the Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and came across an article with the title, “On the bursting of firearms when the muzzle is closed by snow, earth, grease, &c.”!  The article, by Professor George Forbes, is a theoretical explanation of the bursting of firearms and was published in the 1878-1879 session of the Royal Society, meaning that Forbes’ investigation was some 130 years before the Mythbusters!  The calculation and explanation are short and entertaining, and I thought it would be fun to take a look at them.

Continue reading

Posted in Entertainment, History of science, Physics | 11 Comments

Mini-interview in Seed Magazine!

Well, I’m on the road again.  Three days after getting back from a marathon holiday trip, I hopped back on a plane and headed to Texas for a grant-related workshop.  At least the plane out was pretty empty — I had a row to myself, which I used to lay down and catch up on some sleep!

Suffice to say, I probably won’t be posting heavily for a few days while at the meeting, and things will be relatively light through the end of the month, as I’m trying to finish my book draft.

In the meantime, I’ve made it to the big time thanks to my role as topical editor for ResearchBlogging.org!  Dave Munger has published an interview with all of the topical editors in Seed Magazine this month; if you’re interested in my views on how I pick “editor’s selections”, and what I see in the near future for research-related blogging, take a look!

Update: I just gave my talk at the workshop, and once again my yearly irrational fear of being lynched failed to come true, so I consider the day a “win”.

Posted in General science, Personal | 2 Comments

10 days until The Giant’s Shoulders #19!

There’s 10 days left until the deadline for The Giant’s Shoulders #19!  It will be held at The Renaissance Mathematicus, and entries can be submitted through blogcarnival.com or directly to the host blog, as usual!

Posted in General science, Science news | Leave a comment

ResearchBlogging editor’s selections: exporting language, speaking with your mind, reversing streams, and money vs. happiness

  • More on Korean linguistic exports. Ingrid Piller at Language on the Move discusses an interesting project undertaken by a Korean organization: the “saving” of small languages by giving them a written form using the Korean Hangul characters. But does the project help, or make things worse?
  • How to speak your mind, literally. When I was a teenager, “cyberpunk” fiction was in vogue: stories about people with their brains linked directly to computers performing all sorts of shady tasks. In recent years, this has been moving rapidly away from fiction and into fact, though it will be much more useful to people with physical disabilities. Greg Fish at weird things discusses the state of the art in using the brain to control voice synthesizers.
  • On the 8th day of Christmas my true love sent to me: 8 streams reversing… Chris Rowan at Highly Allochthonous discusses geological processes that have reversed the course of streams!
  • Economists (don’t) prove that money can buy you happiness… And news outlets prove they’re crap. Can money buy happiness? Maybe, but recent research highly touted as making the connection really doesn’t. Michael Slezak at Good, Bad and Bogus gives some thoughtful criticism.

Check back next Monday for more “miscellaneous” suggestions!

Posted in General science, Science news | Leave a comment

Lord Kelvin vs. the Aether! (1901)

The more I study the history of aether physics, the more I feel that modern physicists underappreciate both the huge influence the theory had on the development of physics and how it indirectly spurred many positive scientific discoveries, even though it is an incorrect theory. The “aether”, for those not familiar with it, was a hypothetical substance theorized in the early 1800s to be the medium in which light waves propagate, just as water waves travel through water and sound waves travel through air.  Many papers were written speculating on the nature of the aether before Einstein’s special theory of relativity (1905) argued convincingly that the aether was unnecessary.

Nevertheless, these speculations resulted in a number of interesting results.  For instance, we have noted previously that Earnshaw’s theorem (1839), an important result in electromagnetic theory, arose from an attempt to determine the forces that hold the aether together.  In 1902, Lord Rayleigh attempted to detect the aether-induced “length contraction” by measuring the birefringence of moving objects, an ingenious attempt that gave a negative result.

In the broadest sense, a “good” theory is one which raises interesting questions that may inevitably be tested by experiment.  Even if it proves to be fundamentally incorrect in the end, it has spurred numerous theoretical and experimental results.  This can be contrasted with sham “theories” such as intelligent design (the “theory” that living creatures are too complex to have developed without the aid of a creator), which has resulted in no testable predictions and exists only as a way to push religion into the classroom.

By 1900, the aether remained a vexing mystery, and perhaps the foremost scientific problem, for the physicists of the era.  It is not surprising that many famous scientists expended considerable energy to try and elucidate its properties.  In 1901, a paper appeared in the Philosophical Magazine (Ser. 6, vol. 2, 161-177) by the famous (even infamous) Lord Kelvin, entitled, “On Ether and Gravitational Matter through Infinite Space.”  It is not, in fact, an original publication; as Kelvin puts it,

This is an amplification of Lecture XVI, Baltimore, Oct. 15, 1884, now being prepared for print in a volume on Molecular Dynamics and the Wave Theory of Light, which I hope may be published within a year from the present time.

In fact, the article begins with a reprinting of material from 1854, nearly fifty years old!  This is, if nothing else, a measure of how baffling the aether was to physicists of the time — material fifty years old was still, in some sense, “state of the art”.

The 1901 paper, as a whole, summarizes Kelvin’s theoretical musings on the nature of the aether, and highlights how perplexing the topic remained before Einstein’s wonderful theory came along and shattered the aether hypothesis once and for all.

Continue reading

Posted in History of science, Physics | 14 Comments

Kepler’s contributions to optics, at Renaissance Mathematicus

Those who follow this site for optics and history of science posts should take at look at this nice post by The Renaissance Mathematicus.  It covers the contributions of Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) to the modern theory of optics.  Kepler is most known for his astronomical observations, but optics and astronomy go hand-in-hand, for obvious reasons!

Posted in History of science, Optics | 1 Comment

ResearchBlogging editor’s selections: technology vs. prejudice, the history of grain-eating, and curing PTSD via virtual reality

  • Can modern day gadgets help combat prejudice? We have come so far as a society in combating prejudice, but there is clearly much more to be done.  William Lu at The Quantum Lobe Chronicles discusses attempts to use technology to study and reduce such responses.
  • Humans Ate Grains During the Middle Stone Age. Conventional thinking suggests that humans began eating and working with grains some 12,000 years ago.  Rachel at The Sage of Discovery describes fascinating anthropological evidence that this number is too low by nearly a factor of ten!
  • Virtual Reality for Treatment of PTSD. How effective is virtual reality in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder?  Dr. Shock at Dr. Shock MD PhD describes studies evaluating the use of the technique in the field.

See you next Monday!

Posted in General science, Science news | Leave a comment

A new paper airplane world record!

Via The Huffington Post, I found this story pretty exciting: a Japanese man has made a new world record for the longest duration flight of a paper airplane!

Only one man – Japanese paper airplane virtuoso Takuo Toda – has ever come close to breaking the 30-second barrier. On Sunday, he set a world record for a hand-launched plane made with only paper, but fell just short of the 30-second mark.

Toda, flying a 10-centimeter-long craft of his own design, made 10 attempts to break his own record of 27.9 seconds set earlier this year in Hiroshima but failed to best his previous mark, settling for a 26.1-second flight.

That was still the best ever recorded for a strictly paper-only craft. His 27.9 record was set with a plane that had tape on it.

A lot of engineering can go into paper airplane design, and there are a lot of different styles of airplane with a lot of different flight characteristics.  When I was a kid, I had a number of books with both simple and remarkably complicated designs, many of which I can still put together.  Congratulations to Takuo Toda!

Posted in Science news, Sports | Leave a comment

Merry Christmas

We arrived in Chicago on the 23rd, just ahead of a nice ice storm.  Things were a bit of a mess afterwards, but very pretty:

Merry Christmas to those celebrating, and happy holidays to everyone else!

As my usual Yuletide tradition, I present MST3k’s “A Patrick Swayze Christmas”, more poignant than usual due to the recent passing of Swayze:

Posted in Personal, Silliness | Leave a comment