Most of us have heard a statement similar to the one that follows: “The speed of light is constant.” That particular phrasing of the statement comes from none other than the American Museum of Natural History’s Einstein exhibit, so I think it is fair to say that most people have heard it phrased in this way at one time or another.
Most physicists would add one very important caveat to this statement to reduce confusion: “The speed of light is constant in vacuum.” It is in this sense that it forms part of the foundation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity: any observer measuring the speed of a light wave traveling in vacuum will measure exactly the same result, about 186,000 miles per second or 300,000,000 meters per second, usually labeled c in physics. Different observers moving relative to one another will agree that a given light wave is moving at c, even if one is moving towards the light source and one is moving away from the light source! This is in contradiction to our day-to-day intuition: if I am driving towards a car that is approaching me, it will move towards me faster than if I am driving away from it.
From Einstein’s special theory of relativity, and the observation that “the speed of light is constant in vacuum,” comes all sorts of non-intuitive phenomena, like length contraction and time dilation and the idea that, as far as we know, nothing can move faster than c! Apparently the “speed of light” is the speed limit of the universe.
The statement “the speed of light is constant” is therefore arguably more accurate than not, but leaves out a lot of subtlety in discussions of the speed of light! I recently started thinking about the speed of light from an optical science perspective due to a question from a Twitter friend, and I thought I would muse a bit on all the ways that the speed of light is harder to define than you might think, even without talking about objects in relative motion.
Continue reading






